A couple of months ago I wrote a post promoting the use of Twitter’s Circles. It was one of my coping mechanisms for using current Twitter in its semi-broken state.
“Improvement” seems to be defined as: a reduction of projected 2041 travel times (by car) by 90 seconds (page 7).
It should also be noted that the goal travel time is of 9.2 minutes is actually 72 seconds slower than the current travel time of 8 minutes. Travel times increase regardless of the capital expended on adding one more lane because induced demand is in fact real. And the proposal does seem to implicitly acknowledge this.
Or…
To put it another way, the Mayor is proposing to spend
$11,111,111 per second
…of travel time reduction. I have to question whether this is a good use of money.
But nevermind that, let’s talk about safety.
Safety
The City of Winnipeg has adopted a Strategic Road Safety Action Plan with the (very feeble but very achievable) goal of “…of a 20 percent reduction in fatal and serious injury collisions.” So I was wondering how the Route 90 expansion might fit into this.
The fine people over at MPI provided me with 10 years of collision data for Kenaston Boulevard for the proposed “improvement” area. Keep in mind that these are only incidents that generated a report to MPI, it’s safe to assume that this are all “serious.”
Over the past 10 years, 10 pedestrians have been injured in this “improvement” zone. Or roughly 1 in every 108 vehicle collision involves a pedestrian injury.
I cannot see how adding two lanes (a 50% increase) and increasing the speed limit from 50km/h to 60km/h is going to help bring those 10 pedestrian injuries closer to zero!
An at-grade crossing at what is effectively a freeway entrance!
The pedestrians crossings at grade throughout this proposal simply are not going to be good enough! If we’re spending $11M dollars per second of car quality of life, surely we can spend a few million dollars to allow pedestrians to cross this pseudo-freeway safely!
Brent Bellamy suggests that the cost for this project is only a mere $715,000,000. Which brings the per second improvement cost to $7,944,444 🤷♂️
With contingency, widening Kenaston to cost up to $715,000,000. Imagine the social good we could achieve with almost 3/4 billion dollars. Even just staying with transportation, for the same cost we could build the full 25 year plan rapid transit network, spanning the entire city. https://t.co/BnvoHCk7Yqpic.twitter.com/DDxFnGWfMY
Winnipeg City Council Special Meeting – 22nd March, 2023
But it’s over four hours long so I’ve gone ahead and created a table of contents, bookmarking the important moments.
If you’re extremely short on and you only have 10 minute to spare, watch Councillor Allard’s Introduction to his amendment and imagine what a great city we’d have if we had more than one urbanist on council. Or maybe the impassioned speeches by the delegates in opposition to the budget.
Delegations
Think about what kind of amazing city we would be living in if their positions were flipped!
In Support
Loren Remillard, The Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce (5:42)
Chris Lorenc, Manitoba Heavy Construction Association (12:13)
In Opposition
Michael Redhead Champagne & Mary Burton – Fearless R2W (43:04)
Kate Kehler – The Social Planning Council of Winnipeg (49:51)
Ryan Beardy – Gang Action Interagency Network (55:26)
Update: I should note that Councillor Sharma was on leave for most of the day and attended remotely for the vote. She may have had more to say if she was able to be present during the meeting.